Platform

Evidence infrastructure for high-trust AI.

Built for organizations where decisions must be transparent, reproducible, and defensible.

Dali · Legal

See a filing become evidence.

A filing becomes an argument graph. Supporting authorities are verified. Unresolved findings go to attorney review. The complete review is preserved as evidence.

Argument Graph

The filing's legal narrative is reconstructed into an argument graph.

Review in progress

Matter

Mata v. Avianca

Filing under review

Plaintiff's Opposition

13 Supporting Authorities · 17 Occurrences · 7 Verified

Argument graph for this filing

2 authorities require verification

Hover or select any node to inspect.

Core Argument

Court has subject-matter jurisdiction

The narrative turns on whether the Montreal Convention supplies jurisdiction in U.S. courts.

Evidence record

EV-60B694DB

13 Supporting Authorities · 17 Occurrences · 7 Verified

Launch interactive demo

Review Workspace

Supporting authorities and propositions are reviewed, dispositioned, and preserved.

Review complete

Evidence ID EV-MATA-SAMPLE

Artifact A — Mata v. Avianca — Original Opposition Brief.pdf

Two citations could not be matched to a verifiable source record and require attorney confirmation. This filing has 7 citations requiring attorney review.

Unmatched Citations

2 high-risk items

Support Risk

5 proposition issues

Clean / Lower-Risk

42 verified clean

Supporting authorities

7 requiring review · 42 verified clean

Proposition

Subject-matter jurisdiction under the Montreal Convention

Unmatched

Citation could not be matched to a verifiable source record. Requires attorney confirmation before reliance.

Cited authority

Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co., Ltd., 925 F.3d 565

Resolve flagged citations, apply attorney disposition, and preserve the final evidence state.

Open review workspace

Inoo · Healthcare

See a patient conversation become documentation.

A patient conversation becomes a live transcript. Findings are extracted with source timestamps. The clinician reviews and approves the final note.

Live Transcription

The patient conversation becomes a live, timestamped transcript.

Live transcription00:03

Patient x · new patient

Listening…

Ambient capture

Conversation becomes a transcript in real time

Speakers are separated automatically. Each line is timestamped so later findings can cite the exact moment in the visit.

00:01

Patient: I've had headaches for two weeks.

  • — No interruption to the clinical conversation
  • — Speaker turns labeled as they happen
  • — Timestamps ready for evidence linking
Launch interactive demo

Findings & Review

Findings cite the conversation. The clinician reviews and approves the final note.

Live visit · 02:14

Clinical findings

Evidence link

Headache · two weeks

Extracted from patient at 00:01. Every finding cites the original conversation.

00:01

Patient: I've had headaches for two weeks.

Conversation → structured findings → clinician-approved note.

Launch interactive demo

Why one platform?

Built on the same evidence architecture.

Both products share the same evidence infrastructure.

  • Evidence Records

    Durable, inspectable records of what was analyzed and decided.

  • Human Review

    Attorney and clinician judgment preserved alongside every finding.

  • Integrity & Replay

    Reproducible evidence that can be verified after the session ends.

  • APIs & Infrastructure

    Shared evidence architecture behind every GammaLex product.

Industries

Industries we serve

  • Law
  • Healthcare
  • Research

See the platform in action.

Explore interactive demos built on the same evidence infrastructure.

Launch Dali DemoLaunch Inoo DemoContact Us