Defensibleby design

Every citation review produces a sealed evidence record — authority checks, findings, policy version, and three hashes a verifier can replay independently.

Minimal interior architecture and natural light

OPEN EVIDENCE INFRASTRUCTURE

Benchmark engine and full evaluation run on GitHub; seed corpus and verification taxonomy on Hugging Face (YenkLabs research org); hosted review at dali.gammalex.com (GammaLex).

View repositoryView Hugging Face datasets

The Citation Is Not the Record

A citation tells you what was referenced. It does not tell you what was reviewed, what authority supported the conclusion, what findings were generated, or how the review was performed. Dali preserves the entire review process, not just the final citation.

Evidence Across Citation Workflows

Every citation follows the same review process, regardless of whether it originates from chat, MCP, documents, or APIs.

Authority

  • Authority exists
  • Citation resolves
  • Authority resolves

Authority

Smith v. Jones

Resolved

Support

  • Source fetched when reachable
  • Proposition scored when text extracts
  • Unverifiable disclosed when it cannot

Support

Source text could not be scored

Unverifiable

Jurisdiction

  • Jurisdiction identified
  • Authority matched
  • Applicability reviewed

Jurisdiction

Federal · 9th Circuit

Matched

Findings

  • Issues surfaced
  • Findings recorded
  • Review preserved

Findings

3 findings generated

Recorded

Supported Inputs

ChatMCPDraftUploadAPI

Reproducible Findings

Every finding remains linked to supporting evidence.

Evidence record

EV-AEC72CCE
SummaryFindings (4)Evidence

  • Unsupported authority

    Smith v. Jones, 999 F.3d 1234 (2025) was not located in canonical legal sources.

    Review evidence →

  • Jurisdiction mismatch

    Cited authority applies to a different jurisdiction than the reviewed proposition.

    Review evidence →

  • Citation does not support proposition

    The cited authority does not substantiate the legal claim being made.

    Review evidence →

  • Authority not located

    Authority resolution failed against canonical citation databases.

    Review evidence →

Evidence Identity

Every citation review preserves findings, review history, and the steps used to reach a conclusion.

Evidence identity

Evidence ID
5349151480
corpus_record_hash
sha256:c91e…4b2a
replay_hash
sha256:7d03…a1f8
evidence_hash
sha256:a4f2…9c1e
Policy Version
citation-rules-v1.2

Verification chain

  1. 01

    Input normalized

  2. 02

    Policy evaluated

  3. 03

    Findings generated

  4. 04

    Three-hash lineage sealed

  5. 05

    Record stored

Append-only provenance. Reproducible from the same input, policy version, and timestamp.

MCP Integration

Dali integrates directly into MCP-enabled agent workflows to evaluate legal citations and return reproducible evidence records.

Claude · MCP session

Generated Evidence

Every citation review produces evidence you can export, verify, and reproduce — sealed with three hashes that answer three different verifier questions.

Preservation status

Three hashes, three verifier questions — input integrity, reproducibility, and run seal.

corpus_record_hash

sha256:c91e…4b2a

Proves input integrity

replay_hash

sha256:7d03…a1f8

Proves verdict reproducibility

evidence_hash

sha256:a4f2…9c1e

Proves a specific run happened

Dali · Review complete

    Legal citations should survive the AI session.

    When a citation is challenged, the answer alone is rarely enough. Dali preserves the evidence needed to reconstruct what happened later.

    Open DaliView open benchmarkRequest demo