See the filing’s legal reasoning.
A filing isn’t just pages of text. Dali reconstructs its legal reasoning into a navigable knowledge graph, connecting arguments, supporting premises, authorities, and evidence into one inspectable structure.
Built in partnership with
Dali · Legal
What if every legal argument came with a map of its reasoning?
Dali reconstructs the filing’s legal narrative, connects each argument to its supporting authority, verifies the underlying sources, and preserves the complete review as evidence.
See how it works →Verify the reasoning.
Move from the argument graph into a single finding. Verify the supporting authority, inspect the matched evidence, and preserve the attorney’s conclusion.
Finding 3 of 17
“A complaint must allege sufficient facts to state a plausible claim for relief.”
Supporting authority
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009)
- Authority verified
- Matching passage found
- Claim supported
Source evidence
…the plaintiff need only allege enough facts to state a plausible claim for relief…
View full authority →Attorney review Pending
Compare evidence →Inspect the evidence.
Compare the filing against its supporting authority using synchronized, highlighted passages instead of entire documents. Focus on the evidence that supports the finding.
Filing claim
“…the plaintiff need only allege enough facts to state a plausible claim for relief…”
Supporting authority
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
“…need only allege enough facts…”
✓ Authority Found
✓ Claim Supported
Pending Attorney Review
Every review becomes evidence.
Dali preserves every finding, supporting authority, source passage, and attorney decision in a tamper-evident record that can be inspected, exported, and reproduced later.
Matter
Mata v. Avianca
Review
17 findings reviewed
Supporting authority
13 authorities reviewed
Attorney decisions
Preserved with each finding
MatterMata v. Avianca
FindingAuthority verified
DecisionSupported
IntegritySHA-256 verified
